Aaron Carter Says Michael Jackson Gave Him Cocaine
Published on June 29, 2011 by Eric · 27 Comments
By Sleazus Christ
Remember Aaron Carter? He was the little rapping brother of Nick Carter.
Oh, you don’t remember Nick Carter? He was the blonde guy in Backstreet Boys.
Here, maybe this will refresh your memory:
So anyway, according to OK!, Aaron Carter did coke and drank wine with The King of Pop. Talk about the party of the year!
‘I never talked about it… This is the first time. I do… I miss Michael… I have spent such incredible times with him. I did things with him that nobody else did… But I was also troubled about what he did to me,’ Aaron says.
When asked whether Michael gave him alcohol, Aaron tells Daphne, ‘Yes, he gave me wine. I mean, I could have refused, but I was 15.’ As for drugs? ‘He gave me cocaine. I felt weird about that and other stuff… We spoke afterwards, hours and hours, on the phone. I admired Michael, but his behaviour bothered me a lot. Then my mother called the police…’
Seems kind of weird that he would bring this stuff up now, as opposed to…oh, I dunno, WHEN MICHAEL JACKSON WAS ON TRIAL FOR THE BAZILLIONTH TIME FOR FUCKING AROUND WITH LITTLE BOYS!
Who knows? Maybe it’s some legit trauma that Aaron’s had to work his way through. Or maybe he was washed up before his voice changed and now he needs a little money to go score some meth down at the park. Either way, one thing’s for sure:
Yeah. That exists.
Aaron Carter Says Michael Jackson Gave Him Cocaine,Tags: Aaron Carter, cocaine, michael jackson
Readers Comments (27)
RELATED STORIES
Aaron is a liar!
He’s just trying to get back into the world of celebrities.
yes thats true
aaron did not need michael to be a cecebrity.. he is since 8 old
Oh please, if this were true this story would’ve been out out years ago during the trial. If his mother called the police how comes we’ve never heard about it? Everyone knows that MJ news about drugs or kids is always a big deal in the media, this would’ve been front cover news if were true, so how comes were only hearing this now after MJ died?
I dont care for micheal jackson but I know a BS stroy when I see one
come on now
Go away with your crap story full of lies, he never hurt a child. I hope the family drags you to court with this asshole
WHAT A PRIMITIVE LIAR HE IS…
Aaron DID FORGET this interview, In this Interview Nick and Aaron are talking about one time when they were invited at NEVERLAND at Michael’s BIRTHDAY! They are saying how at one point on that day Nick left and he leaved Aaron alone at Neverland to celebrate Michael’s birthday and Aaron slept there. He says that NOTHING HAPPENED, that Michael did NOT TOUCHED HIM and that he slept in Michael’s THEATER. At that TIME Aaron was 14/15 – LINK – http://youtu.be/nE2Cq6WGCpk + In totally unrelated news he owes his former manager $100 thousand dollars, the IRS $1 million dollars … come on… If Michael really did that and the police even got involved, 1) it would have leaked and the media would’ve been all over it; 2) you can be sure Tom Sneddon would have used it in the trial.
That’s a great painting! It’s so full of analogies from the history of art. The painter did a wonderful job.
As to Aaron Carter: very convenient to blame someone else for your own yearlong drugabuse, and if this someone is just by accident the most famous person on the planet this might even get some news coverage, no matter how implausible that story is. Seems he hopes to get invited to talkshows and interviews to be asked about…no not about his new album which is coincidentally out, but about Michael Jackson.
Just another person who hopes to profit of the fact that he/she once came in touch with The King of Pop. On numerous occasions Aaron Carter praised MJ for mentoring him and warning him of all those ugly things in showbusiness.
So, who exactly is supposed to believe his 180degree-turn???
I honestly believe MJ was a disgusting pedophile who so hated being black that he bleached himself until he got chemically induced vitiligo and got himself some white kids and small Caucasian looking nose and wigs
Your a tool show us the evindence ? there is plenty that otherwise!
** Your a tool show us the evindence ? there is plenty that says otherwise !
You have issues yourself so you are not in possition to judge Jackson. By the way next time you go to the beach in order to tan yourself, think about what you said about Jackson and the bleaching thing.Hypocryte.
This is the biggest bunch of BS I have ever heard. Show me a video of Aaron saying this crap then I might believe it. Until then I chalking this up to tabloid garbage!
Michael Jackson was on trial ONCE – in 2005 and he was acquitted. Read Aphrodite Jones’ book The Michael Jackson Conspiracy – she got court approval to examine the court transcripts, all court evidence the jurors saw and didn’t see, as well as interview people involved. She was reporting for Fox News & was convinced he was guilty, then made a 180 degree turnaround.
Oh, yes, agreed – why didn’t we hear about Aaron Carter & his mom before now if she’d called the police? Seems like a pathetic attempt to become relevant at the expense of a dead man who can’t defend himself against accusations.
I’m still waiting for the hundreds of boys Michael Jackson alledgedly molested to come out and accuse him – supposedly they were too scared to do it when he was alive. Hundreds of men who were molested as boys by priests came out to accuse them when the priests were still living.
How believable after all those years. It looks as if someone is desperate for publicity. By the way Jackson was on trial for the first time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po1kFx4zT6Y&feature=feedu
SEE THESE PICTURES:
He also claimed he wasn’t on drugs aged 15, then these photos circulated of him aged 15 smoking lots of pot in his home in Florida:
1/ http://www.yuppiepunk.org/images/aaroncarter-pot.jpg
2/ http://www.3am.co.uk/upload/image/592×0/72b77d3a-5fc0-45e6-b60c-848ddaf203c6.jpg
And his interview:
Aaron Carter interviewed by Howard Stern, 2006 (less strapped-for-cash times, lol)
Howard: Now how do you become friends with Michael Jackson?
Aaron: Well, we met him through Rodney Jerkins, he was in the studio and he wanted to meet [Nick and I].
Howard: Did he give you a car?
Aaron: No, never.
Howard: Is he viewing this situation wrong, Nick?
Nick: No, no, I’m gonna defend him –
Aaron: You don’t even need to. You don’t even need to. Because it really pisses me off that people would think about Michael like that because…
Howard: I do.
Aaron: Well, you’re wrong. You’re wrong, Howard. You’re wrong, Howard!
Howard: Did you smoke weed with Michael Jackson?
Aaron: No, never, nu-uh.
Howard: Tell the truth, raise your right hand.
Aaron: (raising hand) I swear I never smoked weed with Michael Jackson.
Howard: Did you drink wine with Michael Jackson?
Aaron: NO, it’s not true, none of this is true.
The FBI, Santa Barbara PD, and the DFCS all conducted years-long investigations into Michael Jackson . . . they traveled to different countries to interview people, they followed the origins of every tabloid claim, they interviewed everyone who had ever come within 10 feet of Michael Jackson, especially any minors (and that includes Aaron Carter).
All three — the police, FBI, and DFCS — said that there was never any evidence against MJ, no wrong-doing to report, etc.
Yet Aaron Carter claims his mother actually made a phone call to the police, DURING MJ’s criminal investigation . . . and what? The police totally ignored this? (It’s never even mentioned in MJ’s FBI files — and they examined anything and EVERYTHING.)
I’m calling BS. Aaron Carter is a friggin’ meth head who is over a million dollars in debt, needs the cash (OK Magazine pays for their ~breaking news~), and wants attention for his new album.
The author of the OK Magazine article (Daphne B.) is a known liar, too. She’s the one who originated the “MJ’s nanny pumped his stomach for drugs” story . . . which MJ’s nanny then publicly stated was total BS. Not credible in the slightest.
Interesting!
Tt’s just been established that Aaron Carter owes the IRS $1 MILLION.
And if the police were called why wasn’t a police report presented at the trial by the prosecution? And why was Aaron Carter on the Witness list for the DEFENCE? And he decides to sell his story now to OK magazine around the 2nd death Ani of Jackson?
Hmmm… I wonder why?
As for the above painting, Jackson loved commissioning copies of famous paintings like the one below.
http://www.michaeljacksonportrait.com/michaeljacksonoilpainting.htm
How tragic-yet another person trying to profit and win fame of of the back of an innocent man who devoted his life to others. Mr.Jackson was an incredibly moral, humble and gentle person who had an extremely strong view about abstaining from the use of drugs. [A friend who knew him for 20 years states he only ever saw him drink alcohol twice in that entire period.]I think such facts make it abundantly clear that Mr.Carter’s story is a nonsensical, attention seeking fabrication.Now to address the comments of the writer of this article, which demonstrate a complete lack of understanding concerning the allegations leveled against Mr.Jackson. Tragically, due to the media’s biased and bigoted reporting concerning Mr.Jackson, the truth of these allegations, (namely that they were clearly extortion attempts,) was veiled from the public. Freelance journalist Charles Thomson makes this precise point in his article “One of the most Shameful Periods in Journalistic History,” in which he states: “The media did a number on its audience and it did a number on Jackson. After battling his way through an exhausting and horrifying trial, riddled with hideous accusations and character assassinations, Michael Jackson should have felt vindicated when the jury delivered 14 unanimous not guilty verdicts. But the media’s irresponsible coverage of the trial made it impossible for Jackson to ever feel truly vindicated. The legal system may have declared him innocent but the public, on the whole, still thought otherwise. Allegations which were disproven in court went unchallenged in the press. Shaky testimony was presented as fact. The defense’s case was all but ignored.” To read his full article on the grossly inaccurate manner in which the media reported the 2005 trial, click here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-thomson/one-of-the-most-shameful_b_610258.html
. The 1993 incident was a clear case of extortion, a point made clear by the comments made by the accuser’s father in a taped phone conversation in which, when asked how certain situations will affect his son, he states, “That’s irrelevant to me…It will be a massacre if I don’t get what I want. It’s going to be bigger than all us put together…This man [Jackson] is going to be humiliated beyond belief…He will not sell one more record.” This is clearly not the heartfelt statement of a man seeking justice for his son. Several false assumptions are made about this case which are as follows,1) It wasn’t Mr Jackson but his insurance company who paid to the Chandlers.
2) The claim was for ‘negligence’ only (no molestation charges) which was withdrawn after reaching the financial settlement. Mr Jackson always maintained his complete innocence.
3) The settlement had absolutely no limitations for Jordan Chandler to testify in court in case the family wanted justice for their son and insisted on taking the case to a criminal court. They could go on with it while still keeping the money.
4) This opportunity was open to the Chandlers up to the year 2000 but Tom Sneddon, [the Santa Barbara DA] prolonged it as he wanted Jordan to show up in the 2005 court. However each time the prosecutors demanded a testimony from Jordan he left the country.
5) Mr Jackson later regretted the Chandler case had been settled out of court, stating to several friends that he felt it made him look guilty in the public mindset.
Several sources have in fact suggested that Jordie Chandler has privately admitted to lying when he accused Mr.Jackson, (several college friends state that he told them, during Mr.Jackson’s 2005 trial that he thought he was innocent and that his father forced him to do something he didn’t want to do.)It is also telling that he refused to testify against him during the 2005 case.
In terms of the 2005 trial, that again was a clear case of extortion, a family driven by avarice, and a corrupt judicial system willing to support them. Mr.Jackson invited the Arvizo’s to Neverland because he was told that one of the young boys, Gavin, was dying of cancer. In his kind, loving way, Mr.Jackson offered them free rein in his house, amusement park, cinema, in a bid to offer this child a chance for a normal and happy childhood given the daunting propspects he faced. However, when Gavin recovered the Arvizo’s started to exploit Mr.Jackson’s generous and kind nature, routinely using his credit cards, his cars and vandalising his property. When Mr.Jackson attempted to distance himself from the family, they, anxious perhaps that they would lose monyed priveleges, invented their accusations. (All of this evidence is available in Larry Nimmer’s “The untold story of Neverland”, which was used as evidence in the 2005 court case. ) The family’s accusations were used by DA Tom Sneddon, who, it is clear, had a vendetta against Mr.Jackson for many years. Mr.Sneddon, throughout the course of the case, exhibited all the signs of malicious prosecution, abusing his power, and, engaing in illegal acts such as evidence tampering, (eg. putting fingerprints on evidence, fabricating phone evidence,) in order to try and convict Mr.Jackson for a crime he did not committ. His motives foe these actions I can only put down to jealousy and deep seated prejudice. This information is all supported by official government documents-both the FBI files and the DCFS ongoing investigation found one thing against Mr.Jackson-nothing-both documents declared him innocent. Here is a link to a discussion of the DCFS article which stated there was never any evidence against Mr.Jackson:http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2011/05/08/the-dcfs-says-there-was-never-any-evidence-against-michael-jackson-give-this-truth-a-chance/
I am also alarmed by what is a seemingly ignorant interpretation of the presented painting. Mr.Jackson’s favorite artist was Michelangelo, and, as anyone who has studied his work will know, it contains a lot of classical, artistic nudity, and cherubs,(divine spirits who, in the Christian religion serve God closely.)Given Mr.Jackson’s strong religious convictions and deep interest in art history it seems obvious that he would commission such a work. The fact that this writer has chosen to interpret it in an incredibly ignorant manner is evidence of faults in their own reasoning not Mr.Jackson’s.
In answer to Fev-Mr.Jackson suffered from the serious skin disrodr vitiligo which leads to permanent loss of pigmentation from the skin. Such a condition is uncontrollable and irreversible and, in universal cases, treatment normally only extends to the bleaching of the remaining skin so that a person can become one colour-no doubt blotching can affect someone’s self esteem. As David Nordahl, Mr.Jackson’s friend of 20 years stated: “fairly early on the press understood that Michael [Jackson] had vitiligo, [a skin disorder which leads to the permanent loss of skin pigment, yet] …they still hammered on…[the suggestion] that he was trying to be white, and that he was bleaching his skin to be a white person. The skin bleachings were… because of the vitiligo…it is part of the treatment and it is very painful, it’s not a comfortable thing-it’s burning of skin and stuff…When he would go outside…he would have long sleeves on…or he would carry an umbrella…he could not let sun hit that skin-he was so susceptible to cancer because there is no protection…. Even a short exposure to the sun could be deadly. In fact a person with extensive vitiligo that he had, their life expectancy is not normal, it is a very serous condition…and to be so cruel to someone that was afflicted that way is unforgivable. It would be different if the press didn’t know about it, but they knew about it for a long time, for years and years and years.” I implore people to Google “Reflections on the Dance-interview with David Nordhal,” and take the time to learn about the real character of Michael Jackson-the character the biased and bigoted mainstream media spent 20 years stifling, in what became one of the most appalling character assassinations of a kindly, gentle person, in modern history.
arron carter trying to get a moment of fame are you with this garbage oh you wait till he is no longer here any one with a brain can see this all rubbish shame on you
I think it’s not only tasteless, rude, and just wrong for Carter to speak against someone who is dead. If what he was saying was true, where the hell was he when he was alive? He sure picked a convenient time to go and trash on someone now, and not when they’re alive because he wouldn’t have taken that bull lying down.
Instead, if he seems to be perfectly fine with blame other people for his problems, then he shouldn’t of went around blabbing his mouth about how Michael Jackson was ‘one of your friends’ and how ‘he’s this wonderful guy’ and how he ‘cherishes the jacket he gave me’, and then stab him in the back by running around to a magazine telling them he gave you alcohol and cocaine! And that, folks, is apparently the reason Aaron got himself into trouble from the ages of 15-present.
What Carter got himself into is not Jackson’s fault. Someone who taught someone how to drive is not responsible for every crash or ticket afterwards, IF (which, is extremely hard to believe. Aaron is a million dollars in debt, by the way.)IF, MJ did give him those drugs. Which by the way, if he did, it’s funny how it wasn’t being brought up on TRIAL, or anywhere, really, if his mother did in fact call the police.
These lies honestly make Carter look tacky and pressed as shit. What a hag to ride other people to stay relevant. Please See: Your brother, Hilary Duff, Lindsey Lohan, etc.
I can’t even right now with this loser.
For all those who think MJ was a pedophile…
Wrong.
1) Michael didn’t pay the settlement in 1993. As noted in the official documents, quote, “The insurance carrier negotiated and paid the settlement over the PROTESTS of Mr. Jackson and his personal legal counsel.” That means: MJ’s PR team refused to let Jackson go with the case to prevent publicity/didn’t want to deal with shit. MJ’s insurance company paid for the settlement, out of LIABILITY, not negligence. The Chandlers happily agreed.
2) The money was for a civil trial not a criminal trial. MJ was being SUED in 1993 – monumental difference. When there is a crime being commited (such as child sexual abuse) parents go to the POLICE first. That is a criminal case. BUT, the Chandlers went to their LAWYERS.
3) In the 2005 trial, it was found that Janet and Gavin Arvizo (MJ’s accusers) tried to ploy a VERY SIMILAR sexual abuse case aganst security guards in a JC Penny store in 2001. Through that case, Janet wanted a reported 11 million dollars. the court found her to be lying under sworn oath and also maniac – depressive. She was sentenced to jail.
“If the Chandler’s really wanted justice, they could have had their money AND attempted to help put Michael Jackson in prison. Nothing in that settlement document was stopping them from doing so. Despite being very lawsuit happy and trying to sue Michael TWICE for monetary gain, they were given the opportunity to testify against him in a criminal trial in both 1993 and in 2005 and they ran the other way both times. More interested in the money I suppose.”
anything for $$$! douche bag! it’s a shame to lie and use the deceased just for a buck! find a job and work to pay your IRS and debts!a**h*@^ MF!
Aaron who?
This is such a pile of rank bull$h*t!
Trying to ingratiate yourself into the public eye again, are you?
And to all those who continue to stubbornly repeat (and believe!) the sensational lies told over and over again, get your heads out of your proverbial a$$es and read the truth. It’s everywhere now. Take responsibility for your failings and procrastinations. We’ve all been given talent. It’s up to us to discover it and cultivate it instead of bashing and envying others.
It’s time to end your ugly hatred of Michael Jackson. What did he ever do to deserve 40 years of this?